ARKIMEDZ

Posts Art About

LLM use cases

Some interesting use cases of LLMs that I came across

Generate .ical files

Prompt: Convert the following into ical format: [Any itinerary from an email, web page or chat message]

Output: Contents of an ical file which can then be saved in a .ical file and imported into google/apple calendar.

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ChatGPT//Swoop Itinerary//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Your Swoop Itinerary
DESCRIPTION:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20230101T181000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20230102T011500
LOCATION: xxxxxxxx
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

Convert a long form writing into a list of tweets

ChatGPT automatically adds hashtags too! ### Input Convert the following into a list of tweets which I can post:

A lake has a finite number of fish and many fish farming companies fish there. But each fish farm produces waste which reduces the population of the fish for every farm. Each farm can install a filter to reduce the pollution but the filter’s maintenance costs money and reduces the overall profit. Collectively it makes sense for each fam to install the filter. But when seen individually, each fish farm should ensure that every other farm installs the filter except for themselves.

This is similar to the ‘Tragedy of the commons’. In this case, each farm will try not to install the filter so their profit isn’t reduced. And even if just a few farms installed the filter, everyone else will be making more profit. So overall, no fish farm will install the filter. Thereby reducing the overall profit each farm would have made if every farm had installed the filter.

Output

1/5: In a lake with finite fish, multiple fish farming companies operate. Each farm produces waste that harms the fish population. Installing a filter reduces pollution, but it costs money and cuts profit. Individually, farms avoid installing the filter themselves. #TragedyOfTheCommons

2/5: Despite making collective sense for every farm to have filters, the temptation to prioritize profit drives each farm to expect others to install the filter. If only a few farms do, the rest benefit while avoiding the cost. #ProfitOverSustainability

3/5: Consequently, no farm ends up installing the filter, leading to the ‘Tragedy of the commons’. Each farm prioritizes its individual gain, but the overall fish population suffers, and everyone’s profit diminishes in the long run. #ShortTermGains

4/5: This scenario illustrates the delicate balance between individual interests and the greater good. When it comes to shared resources, collaboration and shared responsibility are vital for sustainable outcomes. #CollectiveAction

5/5: Let’s learn from the ‘Tragedy of the commons’ and recognize the importance of balancing self-interest with the well-being of the ecosystem. By working together, we can find solutions that benefit both individuals and the environment. #SustainabilityMatters